Women have more intense emotions than men when conflict arises within the couple

Women feel their emotions more intensively than men when a conflict arises within the couple. Conversely, it is men –who mostly express «powerful emotions» as wrath or despise– who cause conflicts more frequently.

This is the conclusion described in an article published in the journal Intervención Psicosocial prepared by professors from the Department of Social Psychology of the University of Granada, Inmaculada Valor Segura, Francisca Expósito y Miguel Moya. This study analyzed the type of interpersonal emotions than men and women feel when they face different conflicts within the couple, and the effect that emotions have on the recurrence of conflicts.

A sample of 142 – students women and 67 men – from the University of Granada participated in the study. They were placed in five different conflictive situations. In general terms, the results showed that men and women have different emotions in conflictive situations.

Thus, when facing a situation where «my partner offends me or treats me disrespectfully», women felt miserable, while the situation «if my partner is physically aggressive during an argument» women felt more disappointed than men. In the situation «mi partner shouts at me with frequency», women felt more sadness, while men felt guilt. In the situation «if my partner distorts an argument to be right» women feel sadness, while men feel embarrassment.

Powerful and non-powerful emotions

As the research authors state, a priori one could expect men to express more domineering or «powerful» emotions –as wrath, anger or despise–, and women to have more submissive attitudes –guilt, sadness or fear–. The results have proved that women feel more intense emotions, both powerful and non-powerful.

In the light of the results obtained, the University of Granada researchers think that «the socio-cultural context and gender-based roles assigned to men and women respectively might have a relevant influence on the generation of expectations concerning their role in relationships and in conflicts within the couple». Thus, as society establishes certain rules on the composition of men-women relations, it also establishes some rules on how both are expected to act in certain conflictive situations».

Descargar


El País

Pág. 40: América Latina, a través de un juego de espejos

Descarga por URL: http://canal.ugr.es/medios-impresos/item/download/40408

Descargar


Ideal

Pág. 13: La UGR buscará investigadores internacionales para sus trabajos

300 docentes de toda España analizan cómo mejorar las tutorías

Pág. 15 – Publicidad: Centro de Lenguas Modernas. Exámenes para la acreditación de nivel

Pág. 52: Carlos Heredero habla hoy en la Universidad

Pág. 53: Femenino plural

Pág. 65: ‘La Segunda República y su Constitución, ochenta años después’ / ‘La crítica ante el presente del cine español’ / ‘Residencias y palacios frente a la frontera historiográfica del 711’ / Mercedes Ferrer, en directo / ‘Impromascope’

Descarga por URL: http://canal.ugr.es/medios-impresos/item/download/40406

Descargar


Women Have More Intense Emotions Than Men When Conflict Arises Within Couple

A research conducted at the University of Granada has analyzed the interpersonal emotions that men and women feel when a conflict occurs within the couple, and the relation between such emotions and the frequency of conflicts. For the purpose of this study, 142 students –75 women and 67 men–were placed in five different conflictive situations

Women feel their emotions more intensively than men when a conflict arises within the couple. Conversely, it is men –who mostly express “powerful emotions” as wrath or despise– who cause conflicts more frequently.

This is the conclusion described in an article published in the journal Intervención Psicosocial prepared by professors from the Department of Social Psychology of the University of Granada, Inmaculada Valor Segura, Francisca Expósito y Miguel Moya. This study analyzed the type of interpersonal emotions than men and women feel when they face different conflicts within the couple, and the effect that emotions have on the recurrence of conflicts.

A sample fo 142 students –75 women and 67 men- from the University of Granada participated in the study. They were placed in five different conflictive situations. In general terms, the results showed that men and women have different emotions in conflictive situations.

Thus, when facing a situation where “my partner offends me or treats me disrespectfully”, women felt miserable, while the situation “if my partner is physically aggressive during an argument” women felt more disappointed than men. In the situation “mi partner shouts at me with frequency”, women felt more sadness, while men felt guilt. In the situation “if my partner distorts an argument to be right” women feel sadness, while men feel embarrasment.

Powerful and non-powerful emotions

As the research authors state, a priori one could expect men to express more domineering or “powerful” emotions –as wrath, anger or despise–, and women to have more submissive attitudes –guilt, sadness or fear–. The results have proved that women feel more intense emotions, both powerful and non-powerful.

In the light of the results obtained, the University of Granada researchers think that “the socio-cultural context and gender-based roles assigned to men and women respectively might have a relevant influence on the generation of expectations concerning their role in relationships and in conflicts within the couple”. Thus, as society establishes certain rules on the composition of men-women relations, it also establishes some rules on how both are expected to act in certain conflictive situations”.

Descargar


Women have more intense emotions than men when conflict arises within the couple

Women feel their emotions more intensively than men when a conflict arises within the couple. Conversely, it is men –who mostly express «powerful emotions» as wrath or despise– who cause conflicts more frequently.

This is the conclusion described in an article published in the journal Intervención Psicosocial prepared by professors from the Department of Social Psychology of the University of Granada, Inmaculada Valor Segura, Francisca Expósito y Miguel Moya. This study analyzed the type of interpersonal emotions than men and women feel when they face different conflicts within the couple, and the effect that emotions have on the recurrence of conflicts.

A sample fo 142 students women and 67 men- from the University of Granada participated in the study. They were placed in five different conflictive situations. In general terms, the results showed that men and women have different emotions in conflictive situations.

Thus, when facing a situation where «my partner offends me or treats me disrespectfully», women felt miserable, while the situation «if my partner is physically aggressive during an argument» women felt more disappointed than men. In the situation «mi partner shouts at me with frequency», women felt more sadness, while men felt guilt. In the situation «if my partner distorts an argument to be right» women feel sadness, while men feel embarrasment.

Powerful and non-powerful emotions

As the research authors state, a priori one could expect men to express more domineering or «powerful» emotions –as wrath, anger or despise–, and women to have more submissive attitudes –guilt, sadness or fear–. The results have proved that women feel more intense emotions, both powerful and non-powerful.

In the light of the results obtained, the University of Granada researchers think that «the socio-cultural context and gender-based roles assigned to men and women respectively might have a relevant influence on the generation of expectations concerning their role in relationships and in conflicts within the couple». Thus, as society establishes certain rules on the composition of men-women relations, it also establishes some rules on how both are expected to act in certain conflictive situations».

Contact: Francisca Expósito. Department of Social Psychology, University of Granada. Phone Number: +34 958 24 62 77. E-mail address: fexposit@ugr.es

Descargar


Women ‘feel more intense emotion than men during conflict’

A study has found that women feel more intense emotions than men when a conflict arises within the couple.

Conversely, it is men -who mostly express «powerful emotions» as wrath or despise- who cause conflicts more frequently.

Researchers from the Department of Social Psychology of the University of Granada, Inmaculada Valor Segura, Francisca Exposito y Miguel Moya, analyzed the type of interpersonal emotions than men and women feel when they face different conflicts within the couple, and the effect that emotions have on the recurrence of conflicts.

The study concluded that when facing a situation where «my partner offends me or treats me disrespectfully», women felt miserable, while the situation «if my partner is physically aggressive during an argument» women felt more disappointed than men.

In the situation «mi partner shouts at me with frequency», women felt more sadness, while men felt guilt. In the situation «if my partner distorts an argument to be right» women feel sadness, while men feel embarrasment.

As the research authors state, a priori one could expect men to express more domineering or «powerful» emotions -as wrath, anger or despise-, and women to have more submissive attitudes -guilt, sadness or fear-. The results have proved that women feel more intense emotions, both powerful and non-powerful.

The study has been published in the journal Intervencion Psicosocial.

Descargar


Women ‘feel more intense emotion than men during conflict’

A study has found that women feel more intense emotions than men when a conflict arises within the couple.

Conversely, it is men -who mostly express «powerful emotions» as wrath or despise- who cause conflicts more frequently.

Researchers from the Department of Social Psychology of the University of Granada, Inmaculada Valor Segura, Francisca Exposito y Miguel Moya, analyzed the type of interpersonal emotions than men and women feel when they face different conflicts within the couple, and the effect that emotions have on the recurrence of conflicts.

The study concluded that when facing a situation where «my partner offends me or treats me disrespectfully», women felt miserable, while the situation «if my partner is physically aggressive during an argument» women felt more disappointed than men.

In the situation «mi partner shouts at me with frequency», women felt more sadness, while men felt guilt. In the situation «if my partner distorts an argument to be right» women feel sadness, while men feel embarrasment.

As the research authors state, a priori one could expect men to express more domineering or «powerful» emotions -as wrath, anger or despise-, and women to have more submissive attitudes -guilt, sadness or fear-. The results have proved that women feel more intense emotions, both powerful and non-powerful.

The study has been published in the journal Intervencion Psicosocial

Descargar


Women feel emotions more intensely than men

Women feel emotions more intensely than men when a conflict arises between them as a couple, said a study that analysed the type of interpersonal emotions people feel when they face different conflicting situations.

The study also analysed how emotions impact the recurrence of conflicts, reports the journal Intervencion Psicosocial.

It found that men mostly express «powerful emotions» as wrath or contempt, causing conflicts more frequently.

A sample of 142 students, 75 women and 67 men from the University of Granada, Spain, participated in the study, led by professors Inmaculada Valor Segura and Francisca Exposito y Miguel Moya, from its department of social psychology.

They were placed in five different conflictive situations. In general terms, the results showed that men and women have different emotions in conflictive situations, according to a Granada statement.

Thus, when facing a situation where «my partner offends me or treats me disrespectfully», women felt miserable, while in the situation «if my partner is physically aggressive during an argument» women felt more disappointed than men.

In the situation «my partner shouts at me with frequency», women felt more sadness, while men felt guilt. In the situation «if my partner distorts an argument to be right» women feel sadness, while men feel embarrassment.

As the research authors state, one could expect men to express more domineering or «powerful» emotions as wrath, anger or contempt, and women to have more submissive attitudes, guilt, sadness or fear.

The results have proved that women feel more intense emotions, both powerful and non-powerful.

Descargar


Women ‘feel more intense emotion than men during conflict’

A study has found that women feel more intense emotions than men when a conflict arises within the couple.

Conversely, it is men -who mostly express «powerful emotions» as wrath or despise- who cause conflicts more frequently.

Researchers from the Department of Social Psychology of the University of Granada, Inmaculada Valor Segura, Francisca Exposito y Miguel Moya, analyzed the type of interpersonal emotions than men and women feel when they face different conflicts within the couple, and the effect that emotions have on the recurrence of conflicts.

The study concluded that when facing a situation where «my partner offends me or treats me disrespectfully», women felt miserable, while the situation «if my partner is physically aggressive during an argument» women felt more disappointed than men.
 
In the situation «mi partner shouts at me with frequency», women felt more sadness, while men felt guilt. In the situation «if my partner distorts an argument to be right» women feel sadness, while men feel embarrasment.
 
As the research authors state, a priori one could expect men to express more domineering or «powerful» emotions -as wrath, anger or despise-, and women to have more submissive attitudes -guilt, sadness or fear-. The results have proved that women feel more intense emotions, both powerful and non-powerful.
 
The study has been published in the journal Intervencion Psicosocial.

Descargar


Granada Hoy

Pág. 22: UGR

Pág. 23: Pirómano Teatro presenta su espectáculo ‘Impromascope’

‘Memoria literaria de la Shoá’ en la UGR

Pág. 50: Mercedes Ferrer llega hasta Granada con lo mejor de su ‘Travesía’

Pág. 53 – Publicidad: Centro de Lenguas Modernas. Exámenes para la acreditación de nivel

Descarga por URL: http://canal.ugr.es/medios-impresos/item/download/40401

Descargar


Les phares diurnes masquent les clignotants pour les piétons

Conduire avec les lumières diurnes incorporées dans les voitures augmente le temps de réaction des piétons face à l’activation des clignotants, d’après une recherche menée à bien au Département d’Ingénierie civile de l’Université de Grenade.

Les bénéfices des lumières diurnes incorporées (Daytime Running Lamps ou DRL) dans les voitures ont été démontrés dans de nombreuses études. Certaines parmi elles estiment qu’elles pourraient éviter entre 5-15% des accidents de piétons ou de cyclistes écrasés par des voitures. Les résultats de ces études ont donné lieu à ce que les organismes régulateurs en matière d’automobile décident que toutes les automobiles fabriquées en Europe à partir de 2011 incorporeront obligatoirement des lumières diurnes, actuellement optionnelles. Ce fait, ajouté à l’exhaustive campagne publicitaire réalisée par certains médias, a fait connaître au grand public les lumières diurnes et leurs avantages.

Ce travail a été dirigé par le professeur Antonio Peña García, et a compté avec la collaboration des professeurs Juan de Oña López, Antonio Espín estrella, Fernando Aznar Dols, Francisco Javier Calvo Poyo, Rocío de Oña López et Evaristo Molero Mesa.
Recherche de contreparties
Les chercheurs se demandaient si l’incorporation de lumières diurnes dans les véhicules pouvait entraîner une contrepartie, comme le masquage d’autres fonctions d’illumination et de signalisation du véhicule même ; concrètement, les indicateurs de direction ou clignotants, dont la fonction est d’avertir d’autres usagers de l’intention du véhicule de tourner. On a également mis en question l’obligation que la lumière émise par les lumières diurnes en Europe soit blanche, et que ce soit un avantage ou un inconvénient par rapport aux Etats-Unis, où elles peuvent être blanches ou ambrées.

Pour cela, on a dessiné une expérimentation qui a permis de mesurer les temps de réaction visuelle de 148 observateurs face à l’activation de clignotants à partir de diverses configurations contenant la présence d’une lumière diurne allumée. Les mesures ont été prises dans des espaces extérieurs avec illumination naturelle, afin de reproduire les conditions réelles dans lesquelles se produisent les écrasements de piétons lors des heures de clarté pendant lesquelles ces lumières diurnes sont allumées.

Les conclusions démontrent que la couleur des lumières diurnes et l’angle d’où elles sont observées ont une influence directe sur les temps de réaction des piétons face à l’activation d’un clignotant, tandis que la distance entre les deux fonctions, qui est précisément l’objet de controverse actuelle entre les différents organismes régulateurs, ne démontre aucune influence statistique significative avec les données obtenues.

Descargar


Un estudio demuestra que el rojo en camisetas no mejora resultados deportivos

Investigadores de las universidades de Granada y Valencia han demostrado que el color rojo en las camisetas de los equipos de fútbol no mejora los resultados deportivos, tal y como habían asegurado otros estudios recientes, por lo que no puede considerarse un ‘factor productivo’.

Los equipos que juegan con una camiseta roja, como la Selección Española de Fútbol, no son por tanto más visibles en el campo que los que lo hacen con una equipación de otro color.
Así lo han puesto de manifiesto los investigadores granadinos y valencianos, quienes por primera vez han aplicado la técnica conocida como Análisis Envolvente de Datos (DEA) a los resultados de la liga de fútbol española 2010-2011.

En muchos animales, el color rojo es una señal de dominio que puede tener efectos intimidatorios, y precisamente en el ámbito de la competición deportiva diversos trabajos recientes parecían dar soporte a la relación entre el éxito deportivo y el color rojo de la equipación, de modo que los competidores con equipaciones rojas podrían percibirse como ‘más dominantes, agresivos y amenazantes’.

Sin embargo, los científicos creen que los trabajos anteriores no toman en consideración que existen otros elementos que se solapan con el efecto potencial del color de la equipación, por lo que las relaciones estadísticas encontradas podrían ser ‘espurias’.

Para aislar estos efectos han utilizado la metodología de Análisis Envolvente de Datos (DEA) por programas, según ha informado hoy la Universidad granadina.

Los autores de este trabajo apuntan que si existiera una relación entre el color rojo de la equipación y los resultados deportivos, tal como se señala en algunos artículos anteriores, el simple cambio de color de la equipación permitiría mejorar los resultados deportivos de un equipo de fútbol.

No obstante, los investigadores consideran que, para evaluar el efecto del color de la equipación sobre el rendimiento deportivo de los equipos de fútbol, es necesario aislar los efectos del resto de factores que influyen sobre el citado rendimiento.

Parte de los resultados serán publicados en el artículo ‘Does a red shirt improve sporting performance? Evidence from Spanish football’, que aparecerá en breve en la revista ‘Applied Economic Letters’.

Descargar